←back to thread

113 points willmoss | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
arnaudsm ◴[] No.41903559[source]
This is great for creating a media-garden for your children!

Kid content on YouTube and TikTok can be extremly disturbing, even for an adult. Until they turn 16 I intend to vet most media myself on a self-hosted server.

replies(4): >>41904151 #>>41904256 #>>41905227 #>>41910505 #
paulcole ◴[] No.41904256[source]
> Until they turn 16 I intend to vet most media myself on a self-hosted server.

Are you going to use the same methods your parents used to do this for you/

replies(2): >>41904419 #>>41904450 #
mynameisash ◴[] No.41904450[source]
When I was 16, nearly all the media I consumed was vetted/regulated by the FCC.
replies(2): >>41904737 #>>41904928 #
ffsm8 ◴[] No.41904737[source]
Really? I'm a millennial and most of the content I consumed came from

  * Initially various Warez sources (KDX , eMule etc) (2000-2005 I think)
  * later on liveleak, 4chan,  digger (2006-2007? Not sure anymore), 
  * Then stumble upon, 9gag (08-10)
  * finally ending at reddit (2010-2014, that was the year spez edited user comments. Very rarely used it since)
I vividly remember watching pretty fucked up shit back then, like racists executions of teenagers by police officers (South America) and a lot of sexual content, which is pretty disturbing from today's perspective if I don't completely misremember them.
replies(2): >>41905213 #>>41905900 #
arsenico ◴[] No.41905213[source]
However, none of that was fed to you by algorithms, but rather your own curiosity for weird stuff and your ability to find it. I am not saying that it is good or bad, but in my book, it is different from infinite algorithmic feeds we currently have.
replies(2): >>41905529 #>>41905935 #
1. mewpmewp2 ◴[] No.41905935[source]
Yeah, but OP was talking about vetting and policing content. I fully agree that addictive algorithms are bad though.