←back to thread

285 points alephnerd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neya ◴[] No.41901576[source]
If you use Azure in any realistic production environments, then it's on you. Even with $100k in free credits, they couldn't convince me to use it for more than a month. It is expensive, the interface is highly user unfriendly and most important of all, their products don't at all seem reliable for production workloads because of stuff like this. Sorry Microsoft, I think you can do much better.
replies(15): >>41901755 #>>41902286 #>>41902571 #>>41902679 #>>41902715 #>>41903167 #>>41903320 #>>41903580 #>>41903869 #>>41904371 #>>41904976 #>>41905535 #>>41905826 #>>41905858 #>>41907485 #
imglorp ◴[] No.41905535[source]
Even internally: "Not even LinkedIn is that keen on Microsoft's cloud: Shift to Azure abandoned"

https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/14/linkedin_abandons_mig...

replies(1): >>41905808 #
1. eitally ◴[] No.41905808[source]
To be comparatively fair, Google doesn't run almost any of it's public products on Google Cloud, either (nor many of the internal apps).