←back to thread

157 points milgrim | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
deskr ◴[] No.41904638[source]
> ... satellite maker Boeing to address an anomaly that emerged earlier that day, but “believe it is unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable.”

Yeah, the satellite disintegrates and they call it an "anomaly" and "unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable". This response is even funnier than "the front fell off" sketch.

I feel like it's time to class Boeing as not only inept but a dangerously inept organisation.

replies(2): >>41905483 #>>41908577 #
wpm ◴[] No.41905483[source]
Well what sort of engineering standards are these satellites built to?

Boeing: Oh, very rigorous aerospace engineering standards.

What sort of thing?

Boeing: Well, the front’s not supposed to explode for a start.

replies(1): >>41905658 #
1. panki27 ◴[] No.41905658[source]
No minimum crew requirement, though.