←back to thread

183 points gmays | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
reader9274 ◴[] No.41900914[source]
This is like posting "Landing on Mars" and all you did was catch a reusable rocket.
replies(3): >>41901077 #>>41901438 #>>41901508 #
dools ◴[] No.41901077[source]
I think the "step towards being an inter planetary species" as a result of catching a re-usable rocket might have merit in that it makes construction of things in outer space easier (although that's probably a charitable interpretation of the statement).

My take on the Spacex is Mars habitation project is that Musk will put a bunch of edgelords on Mars, and then not really be able to follow up with adequate supply lines and the operation will be offline for a hundred years or so while the climate settles down. The people who live on Mars will then have been there alone for a century and in the 2100s we will send a follow up mission with hilarious consequences.

replies(3): >>41901091 #>>41901932 #>>41903994 #
photochemsyn ◴[] No.41903994[source]
Musk hasn't to my knowledge financed any architectural design projects for a long-term livable Mars habitat that can sustain itself without constant inputs from Earth.

I suspect this is because the most casual analysis reveals incredible difficulties - the structures would have to be buried under a few meters of regolith to avoid constant radiation burn, and the ration of human living space to plant growing space (for food) would have to be about 1:6 I'd guess. The amount of material required to build such a structure for 100 humans? Let alone maintenance, etc.

If realistic plans were actually presented no doubt everyone would start laughing, which is why we haven't seen any mock-ups, VR models, etc.

replies(1): >>41905404 #
1. dotnet00 ◴[] No.41905404[source]
They're working on getting the issue of transport sorted out first because the entire architecture is shaped by the constraints and requirements of your transport system. The amount of mass you can land, the energy needed for ISRU and so on.

HN just has forgotten its hacker roots and instead gets off to unconstructively sitting back and criticizing with shallow gotchas.