←back to thread

157 points milgrim | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nordsieck ◴[] No.41904557[source]
It is particularly bad for a satellite in geostationary orbit to break up or fail. Satellites are packed as tightly as possible into that orbit due to its economic importance (it's very useful for a satellite, particularly communications satellites, to always be over the same part of the Earth), so there is a higher than normal likelihood that this could be seriously disruptive.
replies(7): >>41904586 #>>41904693 #>>41904725 #>>41905123 #>>41905207 #>>41905406 #>>41906037 #
1. exitb ◴[] No.41905123[source]
The most important contributor to a Kessler-like scenario is extremely high relative speed of items traveling on crossing orbits. It’s not very relevant to the situation in a single geostationary orbit shared by all the objects.