My hypothesis is it's because time and money investment was put into aesthetics at the expense of making the product or service better.
My hypothesis is it's because time and money investment was put into aesthetics at the expense of making the product or service better.
> the more obvious effort that has been put into a thing's aesthetics
I would consider that sign example to not be aesthetically pleasing. Maybe it’s more related to the ‘loudness’ of the aesthetics.
There are a lot of simple text blogs on HN which is a great aesthetic, some with lots of thought to keep them simple. Thats the counterpoint IMO.
I've even seen it happen in real time with small YouTubers. They get money and start putting it into "production values", then more often than not the quality of their actual substance declines.
Of course, it's not 100%. There are some flashy things that also happen to be decent, and there are nonflashy things that suck. Flashiness is just a general indicator of what the priorities of the maker are.