←back to thread

366 points virtualwhys | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.449s | source
1. didgetmaster ◴[] No.41904577[source]
How big of an issue is this really for db users who work daily with large tables that are frequently updated but still have to be fast for queries?

The article mentioned that there are nearly 900 different databases on the market. I am trying to build yet another one using a unique architecture I developed. It is very fast, but although it is designed for transactions; I haven't implemented them yet.

I think if I spend the time and effort to do it right, this could be a real game changer (I think the architecture lends itself very well to a superior implementation); but I don't want to waste too much time on it if people don't really care one way or the other.

replies(1): >>41911447 #
2. nasmorn ◴[] No.41911447[source]
Unless you develop some holy grail solution I don’t think anyone will use an unproven DB for OLTP. At least not without HuMongos marketing spend