←back to thread

427 points JumpCrisscross | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
lwhi ◴[] No.41901852[source]
It is no longer effective to solely use a written essay to measure how deeply a student comprehends a subject.

AI is here to stay; new methods should be used to assess student performance.

I remember being told at school, that we weren't allowed to use calculators in exams. The line provided by teachers was that we could never rely on having a calculator when we need it most—obviously there's irony associated with having 'calculators' in our pockets 24/7 now.

We need to accept that the world has changed; I only hope that we get to decide how society responds to that change together .. rather than have it forced upon us.

replies(26): >>41902001 #>>41902004 #>>41902006 #>>41902027 #>>41902041 #>>41902094 #>>41902144 #>>41902281 #>>41902432 #>>41902446 #>>41902471 #>>41902612 #>>41902683 #>>41902805 #>>41902892 #>>41903019 #>>41903144 #>>41903279 #>>41903529 #>>41903547 #>>41903572 #>>41903881 #>>41904424 #>>41904494 #>>41904546 #>>41905807 #
pjc50 ◴[] No.41902041[source]
> I only hope that we get to decide how society responds to that change together .. rather than have it forced upon us.

That basically never happens and the outcome is the result of some sort of struggle. Usually just a peaceful one in the courts and legislatures and markets, but a struggle nonetheless.

> new methods should be used to assess student performance.

Such as? We need an answer now because students are being assessed now.

Return to the old "viva voce" exam? Still used for PhDs. But that doesn't scale at all. Perhaps we're going to have to accept that and aggressively ration higher education by the limited amount of time available for human-to-human evaluations.

Personally I think all this is unpredictable and destabilizing. If the AI advocates are right, which I don't think they are, they're going to eradicate most of the white collar jobs and academic specialties for which those people are being trained and evaluated.

replies(11): >>41902087 #>>41902096 #>>41902246 #>>41902261 #>>41902287 #>>41902324 #>>41902349 #>>41902440 #>>41902449 #>>41902820 #>>41904142 #
michaelt ◴[] No.41902246[source]
> Such as? We need an answer now because students are being assessed now.

Two decades ago, when I was in engineering school, grades were 90% based on in-person, proctored, handwritten exams. So assignments had enough weight to be worth completing, but little enough that if someone cheated, it didn't really matter as the exam was the deciding factor.

> Return to the old "viva voce" exam? Still used for PhDs. But that doesn't scale at all.

What? Sure it does. Every extra full-time student at Central Methodist University (from the article) means an extra $27,480 per year in tuition.

It's absolutely, entirely scalable to provide a student taking ten courses with a 15-minute conversation with a professor per class when that student is paying twenty-seven thousand dollars.

replies(4): >>41902444 #>>41903158 #>>41903565 #>>41903958 #
light_hue_1 ◴[] No.41902444{3}[source]
Oh yes. When I'm teaching a class of 200 students it's totally plausible that we're going to do 10 15 minute one on one conversations with every student. Because that's only 20 days non stop with no sleep.

We would need to increase the amount of teaching staff by well over 10x to do this. The costs would be astronomical.

replies(9): >>41902528 #>>41902546 #>>41902602 #>>41902605 #>>41902784 #>>41902916 #>>41903282 #>>41903293 #>>41903654 #
kubb ◴[] No.41902602{4}[source]
But you can read 200 essays? At this point you can be replaced with AI, you’re not adding any value anymore.
replies(1): >>41902817 #
1. abenga ◴[] No.41902817{5}[source]
Essays are async and easier to delegate.
replies(1): >>41903164 #
2. thechao ◴[] No.41903164[source]
If I'm paying 30k$/yr the professor is damn well reading my essay. If they don't want to teach & grade, they can get a pure research position. Fun fact: pure research positions don't pay as well.
replies(3): >>41903644 #>>41904001 #>>41904087 #
3. lupire ◴[] No.41903644[source]
Pure taching positions pay barely minimum wage. Look up "adjunct".
replies(1): >>41904067 #
4. dagw ◴[] No.41904001[source]
Fun fact: pure research positions don't pay as well.

Where do you get this from? The people I know with pure research positions get paid basically the same (after correcting for 'rank' and seniority) as those who split their time between research and teaching.

replies(1): >>41904384 #
5. lupusreal ◴[] No.41904067{3}[source]
If their situation is that bad they can walk into a local staffing agency and get a factory job that pays 3x the federal minimum wage. Poor pay as a adjunct is a situation they choose for themselves for some reason.
replies(2): >>41904709 #>>41908242 #
6. skhunted ◴[] No.41904087[source]
Roughly 50% of higher education occurs at community colleges. We don’t do research. What you pay for the class does not correspond to what I make. I’m not paid enough to do all the stuff that is suggested in the comments.

The top earning professors in the nation in mathematics are all very good research mathematicians

7. jhbadger ◴[] No.41904384{3}[source]
At least in the sciences, and in the US, there is also the issue that research professors tend to be on "soft money" -- that is they get a minimal salary from their institution but can increase it (up to a point) by getting grants that they can charge their time to. And they also tend not to be in the tenure track system. That being said, if they get large enough grants, they can make as much if not more than traditional tenure-track professors with defined salaries. But in years where they don't get much grant funding they don't make much at all (I used to be an non-tenure track research professor myself).
8. analog31 ◴[] No.41904709{4}[source]
I was an adjunct for a semester at a Big Ten university, many years ago. Like you say, there's usually a reason, such as collecting benefits while running some kind of side hustle. A teaching gig lends itself to this because the hours are flexible (outside of your scheduled class time), there is utterly no supervision, and no questions asked about what your other income sources are.

My office mate in engineering was trying to get funding for a start-up. I was trying to get a consulting business off the ground. Neither of us achieved those things, but whatever. He got a teaching gig at the community college, which is unionized and actually a pretty good situation. I found a regular day job through his network.

A friend of mine had an adjunct gig in the humanities, and used his off-time to learn how to code.

A lot of academic spouses get adjunct gigs, especially if they want to balance part time work with child care.

9. light_hue_1 ◴[] No.41908242{4}[source]
This is spot on! And that reason is peer pressure.

A lot of adjuncts sit around in precarious financial situations, developing serious mental health issues, and drinking problems because the system taught them that this is a form of success.

Going to industry and making money? That's failure. That's an "alternate career". Not scraping by in a system that couldn't care less about you. That's success.

It's pretty vile. I've never had a student become an adjunct. It would be a personal failure that I haven't given them the tools to thrive.