←back to thread

427 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.269s | source
Show context
greatartiste ◴[] No.41901335[source]
For a human who deals with student work or reads job applications spotting AI generated work quickly becomes trivially easy. Text seems to use the same general framework (although words are swapped around) also we see what I call 'word of the week' where whichever 'AI' engine seems to get hung up on a particular English word which is often an unusual one and uses it at every opportunity. It isn't long before you realise that the adage that this is just autocomplete on steroids is true.

However programming a computer to do this isn't easy. In a previous job I had dealing with plagiarism detectors and soon realised how garbage they were (and also how easily fooled they are - but that is another story). The staff soon realised what garbage these tools are so if a student accused of plagiarism decided to argue back then the accusation would be quietly dropped.

replies(14): >>41901440 #>>41901484 #>>41901662 #>>41901851 #>>41901926 #>>41901937 #>>41902038 #>>41902121 #>>41902132 #>>41902248 #>>41902627 #>>41902658 #>>41903988 #>>41906183 #
1. wrasee ◴[] No.41902627[source]
> trivially easy

That’s the problem. It is trivially easy, 99% of the time. But that misses the entire point of the article.

If I got 99% on an exam I’d say that was trivially easy. But making one mistake in a hundred is not ok when it’s someone else’s livelihood.