←back to thread

427 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
anonzzzies ◴[] No.41901419[source]
I don't know what these 'students' are doing, but it's not very hard to prompt a system into not using the easily detectable 'ai generated' language at all. Also adding in some spelling errors and uncapping some words (like ai above here) makes it more realistic. But just adding an example of how you write and telling it to keep your vocabulary and writing some python to post process it makes it impossible to detect ai for humans or ai detectors. You can also ask multiple ais to rewrite it. Getting an nsfw one to add in some 'aggressive' contrary position also helps as gpt/claude would not do that unless jailbroken (which is whack-a-mole).
replies(2): >>41901564 #>>41903508 #
Ekaros ◴[] No.41901564[source]
Sounds like almost same level of effort than actually just writing it yourself. Or getting AI write draft and then just rewriting it quickly. Humans are lazy, students especially so.
replies(2): >>41902093 #>>41903540 #
1. anonzzzies ◴[] No.41902093[source]
When I look around in the shared open workspace I am in currently for a meeting, everyone (programmers, PR, marketing) has Claude/GPT/Perplexity on their screen. 100% of the people here. So I guess this will not be limited to students.