←back to thread

427 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gradus_ad ◴[] No.41897451[source]
Seems like the easy fix here is move all evaluation in-class. Are schools really that reliant on internet/computer based assignments? Actually, this could be a great opportunity to dial back unnecessary and wasteful edu-tech creep.
replies(7): >>41897577 #>>41897592 #>>41898175 #>>41900963 #>>41901020 #>>41902212 #>>41903116 #
tightbookkeeper ◴[] No.41900963[source]
Yep. The solutions which actually benefit education are never expensive, but require higher quality teachers with less centralized control:

- placing less emphasis on numerical grades to disincentive cheating (hard to measure success) - open response written questions (harder to teach, harder to grade) - reading books (hard to determine if students actually did it) - proof based math (hard to teach)

Instead we keep imagining more absurd surveillance systems “what if we can track student eyes to make sure they actually read the paragraph”

replies(1): >>41901616 #
1. wiz21c ◴[] No.41901616[source]
totally agree. More time spent questionning the students about their work would make AI detection useless...

but somehow, we don't trust teacher anymore. Those in power want to check that the teacher actually makes his job so they want to see wome written, reviewable proof... So the grades are there both to control the student and the teacher. WWW (What a wonderful world).