←back to thread

183 points gmays | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jayyhu ◴[] No.41900019[source]
Reading the article, it looks like so far they only have a working resettable fuse (a passive device), and only hypothesize that a transistor was possible with the copper-infused PLA filament. So no actual working active electronics.

And from the paper linked in the article[1], it seems the actual breakthrough is the discovery that copper-infused PLA filament exhibits a PTC-effect, which is noteworthy, but definitely not "3D-Printed Active Electronics" newsworthy.

[1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17452759.2024.2...

replies(7): >>41901011 #>>41901082 #>>41901266 #>>41901359 #>>41901714 #>>41901793 #>>41905509 #
1. greenavocado ◴[] No.41901011[source]
> So no actual working active electronics.

Oh so this is another scam like the MIT Food Computer. At this point I assume everything coming out of MIT is a scam until independently validated by disinterested third parties

replies(1): >>41902525 #
2. frognumber ◴[] No.41902525[source]
This shouldn't be a downvote or flag. It's a serious problem, especially at elite institutions, and especially at MIT and Stanford.

It's also not out-of-line with what credible sources observe:

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/05/time-to-assume-that-hea...

I'm affiliated with MIT, and have been for the vast majority of my life, including at points in fairly senior roles. If you shut people out pointing problems, it will never get better.

There's an incredible urge to defend elite academic institutions, but it's not in the interest of those institutions. Remember your civics class (patriots criticize their government institutions).

The only way I see this fixed involves a period where MIT is viewed like a used car salesman in the public eye for at least enough years to cause enough pain to lead to reform. The endowment is big enough it'll do fine in the end. If it keeps sliding to fraud, it won't.