←back to thread

492 points vladyslavfox | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.407s | source
Show context
trompetenaccoun ◴[] No.41895988[source]
We need archives built on decentralized storage. Don't get me wrong, I really like and support the work Internet Archive is doing, but preserving history is too important to entrust it solely to singular entities, which means singular points of failure.
replies(19): >>41896170 #>>41896389 #>>41896411 #>>41896420 #>>41897459 #>>41897680 #>>41897913 #>>41898320 #>>41898841 #>>41899160 #>>41899729 #>>41899779 #>>41899999 #>>41900368 #>>41901199 #>>41902340 #>>41904676 #>>41905019 #>>41907926 #
stavros ◴[] No.41900368[source]
I designed a system where you could say "donate this spare 2 TB of my disk space to the Internet Archive" and the IA would push 2 TB of data to you. This system also has the property that it can be reconstructed if the IA (or whatever provider) goes away.

Unfortunately, when I talked to a few archival teams (including the IA) about whether they'd be interested in using it, I either got no response or a negative one.

replies(4): >>41900972 #>>41902214 #>>41902442 #>>41904379 #
1. 4gotunameagain ◴[] No.41900972[source]
Why reinvent the wheel ?

There are so many proven distributed archiving systems, a lot of which are mentioned in these comments.

replies(1): >>41902360 #
2. stavros ◴[] No.41902360[source]
What system of these allows me to donate a bunch of disk space to a provider of my choosing, without thinking about it afterwards?