←back to thread

366 points virtualwhys | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mbreese ◴[] No.41900026[source]
So, if this is such a problem, my question is — are the poor MVCC choices of Postgres enough to make the authors (or people here) recommend another RDBMS?
replies(1): >>41900276 #
abenga ◴[] No.41900276[source]
The last couple of paragraphs of the article answer this. (The answer is No).
replies(1): >>41900542 #
1. mbreese ◴[] No.41900542[source]
Thanks - I completely missed the “concluding remarks” paragraph the first time. After the “problems” sections, I apparently just stopped reading.

For others who are curious:

> But please don’t misunderstand our diatribe to mean that we don’t think you should ever use PostgreSQL. Although its MVCC implementation is the wrong way to do it, PostgreSQL is still our favorite DBMS. To love something is to be willing to work with its flaws.