←back to thread

285 points alephnerd | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.637s | source
1. outside1234 ◴[] No.41900414[source]
Why did they admit this publicly?
replies(2): >>41900455 #>>41900614 #
2. downrightmike ◴[] No.41900455[source]
Probably to have something out there so that when they admit it was a foreign actor who deleted them, it won't seem like big news that it is. That's typical for MSFT and how they handle these things.
replies(2): >>41900870 #>>41905752 #
3. tacticus ◴[] No.41900614[source]
they got called out for hiding the reporting of it in tooling that can't be accessed by most security teams.
replies(1): >>41900734 #
4. dathinab ◴[] No.41900734[source]
and they have some large contracts to which they are legally obligated to disclose it, maybe why they tried to hide it
5. hulitu ◴[] No.41900870[source]
> when they admit it was a foreign actor

It is always a "foreign actor". I bet that all bullshit implemented in Windows in the last years (telemetry, spying, dumbed down UI) was also from a "foreign actor". /s