←back to thread

492 points vladyslavfox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
trompetenaccoun ◴[] No.41895988[source]
We need archives built on decentralized storage. Don't get me wrong, I really like and support the work Internet Archive is doing, but preserving history is too important to entrust it solely to singular entities, which means singular points of failure.
replies(19): >>41896170 #>>41896389 #>>41896411 #>>41896420 #>>41897459 #>>41897680 #>>41897913 #>>41898320 #>>41898841 #>>41899160 #>>41899729 #>>41899779 #>>41899999 #>>41900368 #>>41901199 #>>41902340 #>>41904676 #>>41905019 #>>41907926 #
__MatrixMan__ ◴[] No.41897459[source]
To make the web distributed-archive-friendly I think we need to start referencing things by hash and not by a path which some server has implied it will serve consistently but which actually shows you different data at different times for a million different reasons.

If different data always gets a different reference, it's easy to know if you have enough backups of it. If the same name gets you a pile of snapshots taken under different conditions, it's hard to be sure which of those are the thing that we'd want to back up for that particular name.

replies(2): >>41897960 #>>41899538 #
jonhohle ◴[] No.41899538[source]
There was a startup called Space Monkey that sold NAS drives where you got a portion of the space and the rest was used for copies of other people’s content (encrypted). The idea was you could lose your device, plug in a new one and restore from the cloud. They ended up folding before any of their resilience claims could be tested (at least by me).

Would be people be willing to buy an IA box that hosted a shard of random content along with the things they wanted themselves?

replies(2): >>41899985 #>>41900004 #
1. mbirth ◴[] No.41900004[source]
Does anyone remember wua.la? It worked similar in that you offered local disk space in exchange for cloud storage. It was later bought by LaCie and killed off shortly after.