Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    285 points alephnerd | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.374s | source | bottom
    1. kelsey98765431 ◴[] No.41899637[source]
    I wonder which intelligence operation this supported...
    replies(3): >>41899852 #>>41901152 #>>41901382 #
    2. cptskippy ◴[] No.41899972[source]
    Living in your mind must be wild...
    replies(1): >>41900067 #
    3. mattigames ◴[] No.41900109{4}[source]
    Nor anyone prosecuted for the disappearance of the security cam footage of his cell during the alleged suicide due a "technical error".
    replies(1): >>41900442 #
    4. LAC-Tech ◴[] No.41900121[source]
    What are you referring to here?
    5. hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41900442{5}[source]
    This entire thread smells of multiaccounting
    replies(3): >>41900478 #>>41901407 #>>41902647 #
    6. hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41900821{7}[source]
    Weird response, and cool story.
    replies(1): >>41900990 #
    7. notimetorelax ◴[] No.41901152[source]
    None, Microsoft’s internal logging infrastructure is from the nineties.
    replies(1): >>41901195 #
    8. sofixa ◴[] No.41901195[source]
    Same as their security infrastructure then.
    replies(1): >>41905269 #
    9. h4ck_th3_pl4n3t ◴[] No.41901382[source]
    We call them APT -1 (Microsoft)
    10. h4ck_th3_pl4n3t ◴[] No.41901407{6}[source]
    > This entire thread smells of multiaccounting

    Indeed so, username "hsbauauvhabzb".

    11. ◴[] No.41902647{6}[source]
    12. marcosdumay ◴[] No.41905269{3}[source]
    Whoever ran the Solar Winds infrastructure probably put some effort into hardening the MS infrastructure too.