←back to thread

The Stallman Report

(stallman-report.org)
197 points pkilgore | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.433s | source
Show context
tomcam ◴[] No.41868652[source]
I read it all the way through once, but may have a missed something. Am I to understand that because he has (extremely) objectionable private views that he should be booted out of the organization he started? It seems like there is no evidence of untoward behavior, just a bunch of gross opinions?

If that’s the case, I’m completely against ejecting him simply because he publishes nasty thoughts. I say this as a guy who lived through many kinds of abuse as a child. My opinions and almost everything are the exact opposite of his. I don’t like most of his opinions, I don’t like his humor, I disagree with most of his politics, and dealing with him in person is exceptionally unpleasant.

But the FSF is an American organization, and in America we have something close to free speech. If he’s being kicked out for expressing sick thoughts on his personal website, but not in his capacity as a member of the foundation, I believe they are making a grave and immoral mistake. They have every right to do it, but I don’t agree with taking such action.

replies(2): >>41892745 #>>41899480 #
1. tomcam ◴[] No.41899480[source]
Update: I somehow missed a damning section at Credible allegations of sexual misconduct section at https://stallman-report.org/#credible-allegations-of-sexual-.... Thanks to /u/deepl_derber for accusing me of not reading the report and sending me back to the source.
replies(1): >>41900023 #
2. mikrotikker ◴[] No.41900023[source]
"Sexual misconduct" is quite a reach.