←back to thread

555 Timer Circuits

(www.555-timer-circuits.com)
280 points okl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
doe_eyes ◴[] No.41891311[source]
In some respects, it's a testament to how much the world of electronics has changed over the past ~25 years. It used to be that 555 was this Swiss-army-knife IC that you had to learn about. Multiple people published entire books about it!

Today, it's essentially obsolete. You're quite unlikely to find it in any competently-done commercial designs. Every analog trick you can do with it can be done more cheaply, more reliably, with better power efficiency, and with fewer external components using a modern MCU.

It's not that analog is dead, but it's solving different problems now. Including how to keep ultra-high-speed digital signals usable within the footprint of a PCB - which wasn't that much of a consideration in the golden days of the 555.

replies(8): >>41891917 #>>41892186 #>>41892421 #>>41892531 #>>41892665 #>>41892715 #>>41895037 #>>41898701 #
1. iwaztomack ◴[] No.41898701[source]
Its kind of interesting: the 555 is such _horrible_ timer. It can't do a 50% duty cycle without extra BOM parts, even more parts to make a real PWM out of it, and it has terrible temperature and voltage stability. But somehow it persists.
replies(1): >>41904568 #
2. MisterTea ◴[] No.41904568[source]
Bob Pease has a pretty scathing opinion: https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/analog/article...

“Hi, Jeff H., I have almost never used a 555. Maybe never? I use op-amps, LM324's, LM311's, LF356's. I use 74HC04's and 74C14's but not 555's. I've used ECL fast logic, and discrete transistors. But the 555 just does not do anything precise, or even semi-precise, that I need done. So that's one thing I can "share" - my favorite circuit to use a 555, is: a blank piece of paper. Never touch the things. Go ahead and print that. / rap”