←back to thread

492 points vladyslavfox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.322s | source
Show context
trompetenaccoun ◴[] No.41895988[source]
We need archives built on decentralized storage. Don't get me wrong, I really like and support the work Internet Archive is doing, but preserving history is too important to entrust it solely to singular entities, which means singular points of failure.
replies(19): >>41896170 #>>41896389 #>>41896411 #>>41896420 #>>41897459 #>>41897680 #>>41897913 #>>41898320 #>>41898841 #>>41899160 #>>41899729 #>>41899779 #>>41899999 #>>41900368 #>>41901199 #>>41902340 #>>41904676 #>>41905019 #>>41907926 #
__MatrixMan__ ◴[] No.41897459[source]
To make the web distributed-archive-friendly I think we need to start referencing things by hash and not by a path which some server has implied it will serve consistently but which actually shows you different data at different times for a million different reasons.

If different data always gets a different reference, it's easy to know if you have enough backups of it. If the same name gets you a pile of snapshots taken under different conditions, it's hard to be sure which of those are the thing that we'd want to back up for that particular name.

replies(2): >>41897960 #>>41899538 #
Cheer2171 ◴[] No.41897960[source]
Done. It is called IPFS. The IA already supports it.

https://github.com/internetarchive/dweb-archive/blob/master/...

replies(3): >>41898278 #>>41898354 #>>41898515 #
1. __MatrixMan__ ◴[] No.41898278[source]
Right, what I'm saying is that now we need to get the rest of the web (or at least the parts we want to keep) on board.