←back to thread

171 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.197s | source
Show context
quantadev ◴[] No.41896501[source]
One Speculative Theory of Spacetime:

Our universe is a 3D Manifold in a higher dimensional space.

All event horizons have a "surface normal" (orthogonality) direction at any point. For example a conventional Black Hole (2D one) has an event horizon that is a 2D surface. That is, for a flatland creature living on that EH it takes two coordinates to define a location, but these flatlanders would experience "time" as the "growth" of the EH (like when more mass falls into it, and the EH grows), and the direction is "outward" (perpendicular to EH surface)

Now here's the interesting part: Event Horizons come in all dimensions. Our "Universe" is a 3D EH, but of course at any point in space there's a unique "rate of time" and a common "direction" of time, which from a higher dimensional space perspective is simply the "orthogonal direction" to all our space directions. (Time orthogonal to Space [i.e. Minkowski]).

As matter falls into our "Universe", that moves time forward for us. But our universe itself consists of all the "points" (Quantum Decoherence Points) which are co-located on a 3D manifold embedded in a higher dimensional space.

This means the Big Bang has things exactly "inverted", and is wrong. Matter didn't "originate from inside". It's the opposite o that. Everything "fell in" from outside. The reason our universe is expanding and accelerating is because it's a black hole EH. Black Holes mainly just grow (excluding tunneling etc).

replies(3): >>41896567 #>>41897418 #>>41897596 #
nakedneuron ◴[] No.41897596[source]
I agree. The similarity between black holes and our universe is striking. The fact that matter inside it can not be observed from outside opens possibilities for all kind of quantum states, which is maybe, just the configuration of a universe (for example that one we are living in).
replies(1): >>41898035 #
1. quantadev ◴[] No.41898035[source]
There are many different "lines of reasoning" that lead to this conclusion as well. For example as an object approaches the speed of light, an observer will see it become smashed perfectly flat (length contraction) in the direction of it's travel, which is the logical equivalent of a "loss of one dimension".

In other words as something tries to "escape" our 3D manifold the effect that has is to remove one a spatial dimension. Also as something goes to nearer to speed of light, we know it also loses "time" dimension. No flow of time (from perspective of observer).

And all of these same "divide by zero" kind of impossibilities are precisely what's also happening on event horizons. In other words Special Relativity reinforces this theory. My claim is that even the Lorentz equations are showing us the way in which a dimension is lost. Lorentz is a "smooth" way of going from N dimensions to N minus 1 dimensions.

EDIT: So there must be a stronger relationship between Spinors and Lorentz than what's currently known! By having complex components, Spinors is the way to have "partial moves" in a direction, while still technically maintaining orthogonality to all other directions.