←back to thread

549 points orcul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
1. Geee ◴[] No.41896776[source]
The important question is: what is considered a language?

> You can ask whether people who have these severe language impairments can perform tasks that require thinking. You can ask them to solve some math problems or to perform a social reasoning test, and all of the instructions, of course, have to be nonverbal because they can’t understand linguistic information anymore.

Surely these "non-verbal instructions" are some kind of language. Maybe all human action can be considered language.

A contrarian example to this research might be feral children, i.e people who have been raised away from humans.[0] In most cases they are mentally impaired; as in not having human-like intelligence. I don't think there is a good explanation why this happens to humans. And why it doesn't happen to other animals, which develop normally in species-typical way whether they are in the wild or in human captivity. It seems that most human behavior (even high-level intelligence) is learned / copied from other humans, and maybe this copied behavior can be considered language.

If humans are "copy machines", there's also a risk of completely losing the "what's it like to be a human" behavior if children of the future are raised by AI and algorithmic feeds.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child