←back to thread

The AI Investment Boom

(www.apricitas.io)
271 points m-hodges | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
uxhacker ◴[] No.41896287[source]
It feels like there’s a big gap in this discussion. The focus is almost entirely on GPU and hardware investment, which is undeniably driving a lot of the current AI boom. But what’s missing is any mention of the software side and the significant VC investment going into AI-driven platforms, tools, and applications. This story could be more accurately titled ‘The GPU Investment Boom’ given how heavily it leans into the hardware conversation. Software investment deserves equal attention
replies(5): >>41896362 #>>41896430 #>>41896473 #>>41896523 #>>41904605 #
aurareturn ◴[] No.41896523[source]
I think GPUs and datacenter is to AI is what fiber was to the dotcom boom.

A lot of LLM based software is uneconomical because we don't have enough compute and electricity for what they're trying to do.

replies(2): >>41896674 #>>41900192 #
bee_rider ◴[] No.41896674[source]
The actual physical fiber was useful after the companies popped though.

GPUs are different, unless things go very poorly, these GPUs should be pretty much obsolete after 10 years.

The ecosystem for GPGPU software and the ability to design and manufacture new GPUs might be like fiber. But that is different because it doesn’t become a useful thing at rest, it only works while Nvidia (or some successor) is still running.

I do think that ecosystem will stick around. Whatever the next thing after AI is, I bet Nvidia has a good enough stack at this point to pivot to it. They are the vendor for these high-throughput devices: CPU vendors will never keep up with their ability to just go wider, and coders are good enough nowadays to not need the crutch of lower latency that CPUs provide (well actually we just call frameworks written by cleverer people, but borrowing smarts is a form of cleverness).

But we do need somebody to keep releasing new versions of CUDA.

replies(2): >>41896722 #>>41903351 #
1. aurareturn ◴[] No.41896722[source]
But computer chips have always had limited usefulness because newer chips are simply faster and more efficient. The datacenter build outs and increase in electricity capacity will always be useful.