←back to thread

302 points simonw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
zahlman ◴[] No.41896206[source]
>You should never trust these things not to make mistakes, so I re-watched the 35 second video and manually checked the numbers.

>I could have clicked through the emails and copied out the data manually one at a time. This is error prone and kind of boring. For twelve emails it would have been OK, but for a hundred it would have been a real pain.

This seems contradictory to me.

replies(1): >>41896485 #
1. simonw ◴[] No.41896485[source]
Why's that?

Navigating to and then copying and pasting specific text out of twelve different emails (and then removing commas and dollar signs and reformatting dates as YYYY-MM-DD) is still a whole lot more work than watching a 35s video to check that it did the tedious data entry for you.

For the 100 email version I'd do more of a spot check, depending on how high the stakes were.