←back to thread

291 points sebg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
PoignardAzur ◴[] No.41890125[source]
Reading the abstract alone, I have no idea whether it's talking about algorithmic trees or, like, the big brown things with small green bits.
replies(4): >>41890186 #>>41890231 #>>41890247 #>>41890628 #
vatys ◴[] No.41890186[source]
I had the exact same reaction: biology or computers?

The only hint I can see anywhere on the page is "Statistics > Machine Learning" above the abstract title.

I really want it to be about actual biological trees being studied on the scale of forests growing with smooth edges over long periods of time, but I suspect that's not what it is about.

replies(2): >>41891115 #>>41891128 #
ibgeek ◴[] No.41891128[source]
Biological trees don’t make predictions. Second or third sentence contains the phrase “randomized tree ensembles not only make predictions.”
replies(1): >>41896161 #
1. visarga ◴[] No.41896161{3}[source]
Even single cells are able to sense and adapt to their environment. That is to recognize and react.