←back to thread

269 points rntn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
elintknower ◴[] No.41873803[source]
That took long enough. Insane that the gov was entirely silent after this week's starship launch as well...

Even though I'm not an elon fan, pretending to not notice for political reasons (not to mention the insane halving of launches at Vandenberg AFB) is completely insane and damaging to our country.

replies(5): >>41874106 #>>41876196 #>>41876546 #>>41893153 #>>41894100 #
thot_experiment ◴[] No.41876196[source]
I wish I had any idea on how to deal with the Elon situation. I genuinely believe SpaceX wouldn't be achieving nearly what it is without him, but he's obviously also going way off the deep end these days and it's uncomfortable to watch one man with that much power getting increasingly unhinged.

It's something I constantly wonder about, I strongly believe we should be taxing the absolute shit out of people and working hard to flatten society, but I also worry that we need insane people in power sometimes to get stuff done. Starship (hell, even F9) is an astonishing achievement and there's zero chance that innovation would be possible anywhere except SpaceX or another entity with very strong leadership (Valve or Steve Jobs' Apple if they made rockets)

replies(5): >>41889918 #>>41891207 #>>41892655 #>>41894347 #>>41905563 #
TrapLord_Rhodo ◴[] No.41891207[source]
> I strongly believe we should be taxing the absolute shit out of people and working hard to flatten society.

I'm very curious about this mentality.. Do you beleive that meritocracy leads to better outcomes? Why do you think that the government is better positioned to allocate resources than the people who made the money?

If Elon would have been "Taxed the absolute shit out of" after his sell of Zip 2, he wouldn't have founded paypal. too much tax on the paypal sell, he couldn't invest in Tesla or start SpaceX.

replies(5): >>41891494 #>>41891760 #>>41892512 #>>41893478 #>>41895061 #
1. 7952 ◴[] No.41895061[source]
But with a flatter society you could widen the pool of people allocating resources. Elon would have less money but the rest would have more.
replies(1): >>41895253 #
2. DennisP ◴[] No.41895253[source]
But if you want entities like SpaceX, all those other people have to be able to invest in them. That's not the case today.

I think we should loosen up those rules so they can, but that does mean some people who aren't rich or sophisticated will lose their money on ill-advised startup investments.