←back to thread

Accountability sinks

(aworkinglibrary.com)
493 points l0b0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
larsrc ◴[] No.41893900[source]
I've long thought that that is one of the main functions of corporations. There's a reason they're called limited liability. The fact that you can conjure up new companies at a whim makes it easy to shuffle responsibility into an obscure corner.

This is a strong reason that corporations should not be considered people. People are long-lived entities with accountability and you can't just create or destroy them at will.

replies(8): >>41893925 #>>41893958 #>>41894134 #>>41894218 #>>41894483 #>>41894896 #>>41895035 #>>41900100 #
627467 ◴[] No.41893958[source]
I agree with the feeling, but State orgs are effectively eternal (think the various level of government) and still great at diffusing accountability to various scapegoats
replies(1): >>41894049 #
lesuorac ◴[] No.41894049[source]
State orgs (and federal ones) often have length processes before they can do stuff though.

As well as after they do something there is typically a recourse path provided by that org for you to protest their decisions and if that doesn't resolve favorable you can also sue them.

Which differs from the article because the corporation doesn't provide any protest path nor did it have to publish any memo/etc describing how they're going to downsize cleaning for cost-savings. But you can still sue them (but good luck showing damages over an unclean room)!

replies(1): >>41894141 #
InsideOutSanta ◴[] No.41894141[source]
"the corporation doesn't provide any protest path"

This. The problem with "voting with your wallet" is that you can't vote "no", you can only vote "yes" or abstain from voting altogether.

replies(1): >>41894548 #
1. f1shy ◴[] No.41894548{3}[source]
That can be said of many many democracies around the world.