←back to thread

Accountability sinks

(aworkinglibrary.com)
493 points l0b0 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.412s | source
Show context
larsrc ◴[] No.41893900[source]
I've long thought that that is one of the main functions of corporations. There's a reason they're called limited liability. The fact that you can conjure up new companies at a whim makes it easy to shuffle responsibility into an obscure corner.

This is a strong reason that corporations should not be considered people. People are long-lived entities with accountability and you can't just create or destroy them at will.

replies(8): >>41893925 #>>41893958 #>>41894134 #>>41894218 #>>41894483 #>>41894896 #>>41895035 #>>41900100 #
InsideOutSanta ◴[] No.41894134[source]
Yeah, this dysfunction is not a bug, it's the feature. In some ways, it's useful, because it allows positive risk-taking that could not be taken if anyone was actually held (or even just felt) accountable. But at this point, as a society, we've shifted too far towards enabling accountability-free behavior from corporations.

I think a good example of the dichotomy here is Starlink. On one hand, it's an incredibly useful service that often has a positive impact. On the other hand, a private corporation is just polluting our low earth orbit with thousands of satellites.

It's not clear to me where exactly the right balance for something like this should be, but I do think that as of today, we're too far on the lessez-faire side.

replies(2): >>41894180 #>>41894274 #
1. ernst_klim ◴[] No.41894274[source]
Sorry but I find your example totally wrong. Things like radio frequencies and space launches are hard regulated by govs, no corporation can launch satellites at will without permission from the government(s).
replies(1): >>41895175 #
2. InsideOutSanta ◴[] No.41895175[source]
Doesn't that apply to all companies? They have to follow the laws. Accountability sinks exist orthogonal to that.