←back to thread

410 points jjulius | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rKarpinski ◴[] No.41889014[source]
'Pedestrian' in this context seems pretty misleading

"Two vehicles collided on the freeway, blocking the left lane. A Toyota 4Runner stopped, and two people got out to help with traffic control. A red Tesla Model Y then hit the 4Runner and one of the people who exited from it. "

edit: Parent article was changed... I was referring to the title of the NPR article.

replies(3): >>41889049 #>>41889056 #>>41889087 #
Retric ◴[] No.41889049[source]
More clarity may change people’s opinion of the accident, but IMO pedestrian meaningfully represents someone who is limited to human locomotion and lacks any sort of protection in a collision.

Which seems like a reasonable description of the type of failure involved in the final few seconds before impact.

replies(4): >>41889121 #>>41889482 #>>41889710 #>>41890039 #
rKarpinski ◴[] No.41889482[source]
Omitting that the pedestrian was on a freeway meaningfully mis-represents the situation.
replies(3): >>41890503 #>>41893497 #>>41894022 #
1. nkrisc ◴[] No.41894022{3}[source]
No, you’re not allowed to hit pedestrians on the freeway either.

There are many reasons why a pedestrian might be on the freeway. It’s not common but I see it at least once a month and I drive extra carefully when I do, moving over if I can and slowing down.