←back to thread

302 points simonw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
anigbrowl ◴[] No.41889614[source]
Being Google, isn't it highly likely that the price is a loss leader which will later be changed once customers are sufficiently locked in? I get that this is more convenient than doing it programatically or manually, but that seems like a reason to using something other than gmail. This approach just seems incredibly wasteful to me.
replies(1): >>41891424 #
simonw ◴[] No.41891424[source]
Pretty much everyone who prices out Gemini has the same question - these prices just seem WAY to cheap to be sustainable long term.

I've tried bouncing this off some Google employees and the general vibes I got back from them is that Google is very good at running stuff like this at a scale that drives down the cost for individual queries, so they seemed confident that these prices were not a loss leader strategy.

I don't know if I can believe that though. It's just SO cheap!

replies(1): >>41893329 #
1. kanwisher ◴[] No.41893329[source]
In past Google notoriously 10x prices once it’s no longer the main pet project and they can’t just lose cash on it