←back to thread

352 points ferriswil | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kayo_20211030 ◴[] No.41890110[source]
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Maybe it's possible, but consider that some really smart people, in many different groups, have been working diligently in this space for quite a while; so claims of 95% savings on energy costs _with equivalent performance_ is in the extraordinary category. Of course, we'll see when the tide goes out.
replies(6): >>41890280 #>>41890322 #>>41890352 #>>41890379 #>>41890428 #>>41890702 #
manquer ◴[] No.41890379[source]
It is a click bait headline the claim itself is not extraordinary. the preprint from arxiv was posted here some time back .

The 95% gains is specifically only for multiplication operations, inference is compute light and memory heavy in the first place so the actual gains would be far less smaller .

Tech journalism (all journalism really) can hardly be trusted to publish grounded news with the focus on clicks and revenue they need to survive.

replies(3): >>41890560 #>>41891862 #>>41892643 #
1. ksec ◴[] No.41892643[source]
>Tech journalism (all journalism really) can hardly be trusted to publish grounded news with the focus on clicks and revenue they need to survive.

Right now the only way to gain real knowledge is actually to read comments of those articles.