←back to thread

201 points geox | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.039s | source
Show context
firefoxd ◴[] No.41888432[source]
You have to see those whales skeletons in person to understand their sheer size. And if you want to know more than you need to about whales, pick up a copy of Moby Dick. Don't be intimidated by the size. I still can't believe this book was written in the 1800s. Catching a whale was akin to striking oil.
replies(9): >>41888456 #>>41888488 #>>41888714 #>>41889004 #>>41889443 #>>41889626 #>>41890718 #>>41892776 #>>41898969 #
gurjeet ◴[] No.41888488[source]
> to understand their sheer size

In the linked article, towards the middle, the photo shows 2 people reading the plaque next to a pink structure, which appears to be that of a whale's heart. That, combined with the skeleton hanging over them, should give us an idea that we are no bigger to these whales, than probably an average snail is to us (between 5 cm and 9 cm).

replies(1): >>41889264 #
dmd ◴[] No.41889264[source]
The average snail is 2-5 cm, not 5-9 cm. Just sayin.
replies(2): >>41889364 #>>41889436 #
ygra ◴[] No.41889364[source]
Perhaps they meant slugs. In German at least, both are called Schnecken (just one is naked), so perhaps that persists in other languages as well.
replies(1): >>41891744 #
1. mkl ◴[] No.41891744[source]
I think it's more likely different species in different places. I, in NZ, don't think I've ever seen a slug as much as 5cm long, let alone 9cm.
replies(1): >>41895359 #
2. amanaplanacanal ◴[] No.41895359[source]
Look up banana slug. Common where I live.