←back to thread

Have McKinsey and its consulting rivals got too big?

(www.economist.com)
167 points godelmachine | 2 comments | 19 Oct 24 14:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
photochemsyn ◴[19 Oct 24 17:26 UTC] No.41889135[source]▶
Don't all these consulting firms have a really bad record when it comes to large-scale infrastructure projects? Some of the worst examples are Ciudad Real International Airport (Spain/McKinsey), Karuma Hydroelectric Project (Uganda/Deloitte), Chongwe River Water Supply Project (Zambia/Boston Consulting Group), Isimba Dam Project (Uganda/McKinsey), Haramain High-Speed Rail Project (Saudi Arabia/Deloitte), and Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant on Long Island, New York (McKinsey).

In constrast, China's infrastructure projects are highly successful - high-speed rail now covers 42,000 km across 100 corridors, and the first one was only completed in 2008. Based on their example, the most efficient way to build modern infrastructure is to cut the consultancy firms out of the loop entirely.

replies(3): >>41889960 #>>41890832 #>>41894772 #
1. napoleongl ◴[19 Oct 24 21:14 UTC] No.41890832[source]▶
Nya Kalolinska Hospital in Stocholm was pretty much the work of BGC… most expensive hospital in the world. (In Swedish but GPTs exist nowadays so…) https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/stockholm/nks
replies(1): >>41893852 #
2. rcbdev ◴[20 Oct 24 08:23 UTC] No.41893852[source]▶
The AKH (Vienna General Hospital) was orders of magnitude more expensive than the Nya Karolinska. It cost 43 billion Schilling to build in the 70s, amounting to roughly 5.8 billion euros today.