←back to thread

167 points godelmachine | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
mentalgear ◴[] No.41889115[source]
It's not just that they're too big—it's that they're morally corrupt and largely unregulated. These firms have been involved in everything from tobacco lobbying to the 2008 financial crisis to pushing opioids, and that’s just scratching the surface. Despite their role in these crises, they’ve faced zero accountability and continue to rake in massive profits.

As for their supposed value (which comes directly from ex-employees): big consulting firms are essentially hired as a liability shield for the C-suite. Their main job is to back up whatever the CEO already wants to do (usually cost-cutting). This way, executives can claim: a) "McKinsey recommended it, so it must be right," and b) "If it goes wrong, it’s on McKinsey, not us."

replies(4): >>41889297 #>>41890054 #>>41890289 #>>41890873 #
1. throw4950sh06 ◴[] No.41890054[source]
How do you want to regulate somebody giving advice to people for money?
replies(1): >>41890821 #
2. VHRanger ◴[] No.41890821[source]
Correct.

The word here is not "regulate" it's "enforcement".

People doing illegal things should face personal responsibility on the actions. So do managers who approved it.

The issue with enforcement is the same thing that happened in 2008: enforcing white collar crimes is expensive and high risk for prosecutors who want slam dunks to advance their careers