←back to thread

154 points davidandgoliath | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
spaceman_2020 ◴[] No.41873551[source]
Matt’s response to DHH was really some of the pettiest stuff I’ve seen from a major public figure in the tech world

Maybe its a newfound persona, maybe its a new marketing angle, or maybe its just someone going a little unhinged. But all isn’t right in the WordPress world

replies(3): >>41873702 #>>41873810 #>>41874124 #
preommr ◴[] No.41873810[source]
It is petty, but I find myself on Matt's side.

I think he's right about the movement, right about better monetization for open source, right about the trademark issues, and while rude, his comments are harsh truths about DHH and his work in OSS.

Obviously, they way he's handled everything has been bad - very valid to ask why he didn't act sooner about the trademark issue. And, snide comments about DHH not donating enough to charity are irrelevant. But he is right about a the core issues.

replies(2): >>41874733 #>>41876094 #
jeltz ◴[] No.41874733[source]
The harsh truth that DHH made a ton of money but did not choose to dedicate his life to become filthy rich but instead also focused on making the world a better place through open source?

I am no fan of DHH but I do not see any harsh truths.

replies(1): >>41876368 #
preommr ◴[] No.41876368[source]
This is an uncharitable take.

An alternative one would be that DHH had ideas and works that could've been much more successful that would let him hire people that would further the goals of OSS. That he could have had companies with corporate values that are more distinct from companies whose goals are purely to extract value for their shareholders.

replies(1): >>41889737 #
1. jeltz ◴[] No.41889737[source]
More successful than Rails? A technology which changed the whole industry?