←back to thread

167 points godelmachine | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.265s | source
Show context
mentalgear ◴[] No.41889115[source]
It's not just that they're too big—it's that they're morally corrupt and largely unregulated. These firms have been involved in everything from tobacco lobbying to the 2008 financial crisis to pushing opioids, and that’s just scratching the surface. Despite their role in these crises, they’ve faced zero accountability and continue to rake in massive profits.

As for their supposed value (which comes directly from ex-employees): big consulting firms are essentially hired as a liability shield for the C-suite. Their main job is to back up whatever the CEO already wants to do (usually cost-cutting). This way, executives can claim: a) "McKinsey recommended it, so it must be right," and b) "If it goes wrong, it’s on McKinsey, not us."

replies(4): >>41889297 #>>41890054 #>>41890289 #>>41890873 #
terminalbraid ◴[] No.41889297[source]
> they’ve faced zero accountability

https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2024/10/18/79...

Is that not an example of accountability directly for the things you're complaining about?

replies(2): >>41889350 #>>41890076 #
1. eesmith ◴[] No.41889350[source]
How much did they make from helping lying drug dealers? The article doesn't say. If damages weren't at least 3x revenue + attorney fees, it's the cost of doing business. It's not like every shady thing they do gets caught.

Better would be if people faced jail time.