←back to thread

Using static websites for tiny archives

(alexwlchan.net)
384 points ingve | 1 comments | 18 Oct 24 06:12 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
zoobab ◴[18 Oct 24 12:45 UTC] No.41878906[source]▶
PDF is better for archiving, but what about videos?

HTML ready sucks for archiving.

replies(2): >>41880370 #>>41889204 #
1. approxim8ion ◴[19 Oct 24 17:34 UTC] No.41889204[source]▶
HTML supports video just fine and has for years. Can't imagine why it would be an issue.