←back to thread

167 points godelmachine | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.842s | source
Show context
jakubmazanec ◴[] No.41888729[source]
Obligatory John Oliver video on the topic: https://youtu.be/AiOUojVd6xQ?si=anI1_FKkDM4oDI1M
replies(1): >>41888738 #
artursapek ◴[] No.41888738[source]
Nothing about John Oliver is obligatory
replies(2): >>41888787 #>>41889429 #
stonethrowaway ◴[] No.41888787[source]
Less than nothing. It has flipped to the other side in the bullshit of it all. Pundit hot takes have ruined quality dialogue. Frankly I’d rather have discussions with people who do their own research and form their own opinions, no matter how faulty those opinions may be (there is always room for improvement precisely because there is room for discussion), than to hear them regurgitate party-speak drivel shilled by actors.

Talking heads are a cancer upon society.

edit: to the folks responding saying something to the effect of “you don’t know what you’re talking about!” - I could have saved you the trouble and written your responses down ahead of time. They’re trite and reflexive. Oliver is a shill, down to the so-called data. He’s an approved mouthpiece on behalf of the state. He discusses and he frames only what is allowed to be said in a context it’s allowed in, and his edgy woke takes are the complete opposite of. They’re edgy because of how milquetoast the Overton window has become.

Put another way, if you’re in unison cheering for someone who is allowed to have their own TV show, it’s time to ask yourself if you’re being played with bread and circuses. You won’t hear the opposition because, well, in older times and other places they’d be disappeared/imprisoned, but today it’s mostly people like this twat (and yourselves) drowning out the contrarian voices.

Job well done lads.

replies(4): >>41888866 #>>41888926 #>>41888933 #>>41888954 #
1. jakubmazanec ◴[] No.41888954[source]
If only you did your own research on how John Oliver does his research.
replies(1): >>41889082 #
2. karmakurtisaani ◴[] No.41889082[source]
Source: trust me bro?
replies(2): >>41889164 #>>41890524 #
3. jprd ◴[] No.41889164[source]
https://youtu.be/Q9kNMJ8SguQ?t=898
4. jakubmazanec ◴[] No.41890524[source]
Please, do your own research. That's the whole point.