←back to thread

167 points godelmachine | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
robertoandred ◴[] No.41888685[source]
Gotten*

C'mon, The Economist

replies(2): >>41888705 #>>41888708 #
1. js2 ◴[] No.41888705[source]
Pretty sure it's a US/UK thing.
replies(1): >>41889185 #
2. seabass-labrax ◴[] No.41889185[source]
Historically speaking, it's common to both UK and US English because it predates the European colonization of America:

http://www.miketodd.net/encyc/gotten.htm

Personally, for a situation like this I'd use the somewhat more formal 'become' instead!

replies(1): >>41889967 #
3. lysace ◴[] No.41889967[source]
Agreed. "got" is more informal and less universal across variants of the English language than "become". Bad editing.
replies(1): >>41890228 #
4. graemep ◴[] No.41890228{3}[source]
Given "got" is used in both British and American English and "gotten" is used only in American English (I do not think it is used in other variants either) I do not agree about "universal"
replies(1): >>41890299 #
5. lysace ◴[] No.41890299{4}[source]
I meant to agree that "become" should have been used instead.