←back to thread

359 points sdsykes | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stevefan1999 ◴[] No.41886077[source]
But why do we have to "discover" it when we know the formula would be 2^N - 1...? Are we trying to prove a corollary or what?
replies(2): >>41886104 #>>41886109 #
aaronmdjones ◴[] No.41886104[source]
Not all 2^N - 1 are prime. For example, N=18 makes 2^N - 1 = 262143, which can also be written as 3^3 * 7 * 19 * 73 (not prime).
replies(2): >>41886111 #>>41887510 #
1. umanwizard ◴[] No.41887510[source]
A lot simpler example is 2^4-1=5*3
replies(1): >>41890565 #
2. lupire ◴[] No.41890565[source]
2^11-1 (prime power) for a less trivial example