←back to thread

410 points jjulius | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ivewonyoung ◴[] No.41884954[source]
> NHTSA said it was opening the inquiry after four reports of crashes where FSD was engaged during reduced roadway visibility like sun glare, fog, or airborne dust. A pedestrian was killed in Rimrock, Arizona, in November 2023 after being struck by a 2021 Tesla Model Y, NHTSA said. Another crash under investigation involved a reported injury

> The probe covers 2016-2024 Model S and X vehicles with the optional system as well as 2017-2024 Model 3, 2020-2024 Model Y, and 2023-2024 Cybertruck vehicles.

This is good, but also for context 45 thousand people are killed in auto accidents in just the US every year, making 4 report crashes and 1 reported fatality for 2.4 million vehicles over 8 years look miniscule by comparison, or even better than many human drivers.

replies(6): >>41885003 #>>41885005 #>>41885011 #>>41885014 #>>41885082 #>>41885133 #
dekhn ◴[] No.41885005[source]
Those numbers aren't all the fatalities associated with tesla cars; IE, you can't compare the 45K/year (roughly 1 per 100M miles driven) to the limited number of reports.

What they are looking for is whether there are systematic issues with the design and implementation that make it unsafe.

replies(1): >>41885037 #
moduspol ◴[] No.41885037[source]
Unsafe relative to what?

Certainly not to normal human drivers in normal cars. Those are killing people left and right.

replies(4): >>41885058 #>>41885059 #>>41885414 #>>41885449 #
1. AlexandrB ◴[] No.41885414{3}[source]
No they're not. And if you do look at human drivers you're likely to see a Pareto distribution where 20% of drivers cause most of the accidents. This is completely unlike something like FSD where accidents would be more evenly distributed. It's entirely possible that FSD would make 20% of the drivers safer and ~80% less safe even if the overall accident rate was lower.