←back to thread

226 points cloudfudge | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mmooss ◴[] No.41881857[source]
It's a great start. Co-ops and non-profits can also be subverted and taken over. I hope you look ahead and plan very carefully.

For example, according to an (unverified) story someone told me, a vendor to US east coast food cooperatives now controls many of them; they get their person in, pass bylaws empowering them and disempowering the board (the board usually lacking sophistication), and have deeper pockets for any legal struggle than any co-op member does.

Also, I remember in the news that a non-profit or limited-profit company in the IT industry, founded for the public good, is going to be turned into a for-profit. The board actually fired the person behind this plan, but that person came back and fired the board members.

replies(6): >>41882450 #>>41883179 #>>41883240 #>>41883384 #>>41883413 #>>41887617 #
__MatrixMan__ ◴[] No.41882450[source]
The FAQ has:

> Is this a crypto thing?

>> No.

I realize that crypto is a bad word for some people, but I think that the above answer has a corollary:

> Does it have a single point of control that will attract corruption if enough of us start using it?

>> Yes

Certainly plenty of poorly designed crypto things also have that point of control, but a well designed crypto thing at least has a shot at resilience.

replies(5): >>41882504 #>>41882792 #>>41883252 #>>41883259 #>>41883338 #
littlestymaar ◴[] No.41883338[source]
> Certainly plenty of poorly designed crypto things also have that point of control,

They all have. They just claim they can work against social dynamics with technology but that's a fool errand.

replies(1): >>41884121 #
__MatrixMan__ ◴[] No.41884121[source]
Several technologies have managed it. The printing press, the vaccine, the nuclear bomb. It's even crazier to not try.
replies(2): >>41885186 #>>41890222 #
1. cyberax ◴[] No.41885186[source]
Wait, what? Are you comparing cryptocrap with vaccines?!?