←back to thread

321 points jhunter1016 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
cynicalpeace ◴[] No.41882321[source]
I'm betting against OpenAI. Sam Altman has proven himself and his company untrustworthy. In long running games, untrustworthy players lose out.

If you disagree, I would argue you have a very sad view of the world, where truth and cooperation are inferior to lies and manipulation.

replies(17): >>41882351 #>>41882366 #>>41882502 #>>41882707 #>>41882720 #>>41882775 #>>41882946 #>>41883233 #>>41883261 #>>41883435 #>>41883475 #>>41883560 #>>41883612 #>>41883665 #>>41883825 #>>41883868 #>>41884385 #
cynicalpeace ◴[] No.41882366[source]
A telling quote about Sam, besides the "island of cannibals" one. Is actually one Sam published himself:

"Successful people create companies. More successful people create countries. The most successful people create religions"

This definition of success is founded on power and control. It's one of the worst definitions you could choose.

There are nobler definitions, like "Successful people have many friends and family" or "Successful people are useful to their compatriots"

Sam's published definition (to be clear, he was quoting someone else and then published it) tells you everything you need to know about his priorities.

replies(5): >>41882703 #>>41882890 #>>41882972 #>>41883621 #>>41883750 #
mensetmanusman ◴[] No.41882890[source]
Those are boring definitions of success. If you can’t create a stable family, your not successful at one facet, but you could be at another (eg musk.).
replies(2): >>41882968 #>>41884180 #
1. Grimblewald ◴[] No.41884180[source]
Someone born to enormous wealth is a bad example of someone being instrumental to their own success in influencing things.