←back to thread

192 points lightlyused | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.267s | source
Show context
IncreasePosts ◴[] No.41881461[source]
Solar powered sites are cool and fun, but I find it ultimately lacking because so much of the rest of the networking infrastructure is reliant on the grid. It would be more energy efficient to just host the static site on cloudflare or whatever, and use the solar panel to charge some batteries, or something you would normally use the grid for. I suspect overall energy usage would be even lower if the site was hosted on a CDN, due to the CDN operators keeping their machines near full utilization, and fewer network hops required for an average request.
replies(5): >>41881698 #>>41881739 #>>41882749 #>>41884166 #>>41884809 #
1. j45 ◴[] No.41882749[source]
That doesn't seem to make sense.

Yeah, it's only a 50W solar panel. The solar power could be upgraded to a 400W no problem and the issue you have will no longer exist.

Often people smart with a small system to get things figured out how they want it before adding more capacity. Seems reasonable, no?

Networking equipment shouldn't be much power, speaking from personal experience.

It can be on a small UPS, even one from Costco to run it all off battery, and then solar to refill.