←back to thread

226 points cloudfudge | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.489s | source
1. ChrisArchitect ◴[] No.41882389[source]
So, great, another place to host and sell your music. Love bandcamp. Nothing really that special about it. It rose to popularity because it didn't take that much of a cut of sales from the artists and was offering the easy ability to host all the digital files etc. What's different about this? The 'artists' will have a say on the cut that Subvert is taking? Shrug. All sounds fine and not really that complicated. It will all come down to traction and getting a lot of artists/labels to move there, and that is a crapshoot really. Especially since Bandcamp currently hasn't been impacted in any major way. That and the usual not-really-that-minor challenges of hosting/bandwidth/payment processing fees at scale.
replies(2): >>41883023 #>>41884421 #
2. n-exploit ◴[] No.41883023[source]
You might underestimate the power games that are artist royalties agreements and the current domination by large corporates.
3. jtafurth ◴[] No.41884421[source]
The real problem with the platform I think is discoverability, and that will get affected more and more with corporate clutches.

However I do agree with your point overall, I'm struggling to see how this will not go the same path in a few years.