←back to thread

260 points scastiel | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
Dachande663 ◴[] No.41879983[source]
I love the idea of this but, given the traffic numbers, this could run on a $4 Digital Ocean droplet and have the same result. They've burnt over a grand just to use vercel. Maybe I'm just older but I don't understand the logic here. A basic VPS, setup once, would have the same result and would be neutral in cost (it's how I run my own little free apps). Maybe the author is lucky enough that $100/mo doesn't really affect them or they're happy for it to pay for the convenience (my assumption).
replies(2): >>41880001 #>>41880047 #
scastiel ◴[] No.41880001[source]
Running a database accessed that many times on a $4 Digital Ocean droplet? I'd be very curious to see that ;)

The web hosting costs basically nothing. Most of the cost comes from the database.

replies(12): >>41880056 #>>41880066 #>>41880076 #>>41880501 #>>41880784 #>>41881017 #>>41881172 #>>41881238 #>>41881868 #>>41882316 #>>41884008 #>>41887515 #
1. bdlowery ◴[] No.41882316[source]
https://f5bot.com/ was free for like 8 years and it processed hundreds of thousands of db records a day, and it barely cost anything.