C# has nothing like that, xml comments and raw documentation that has no value
Some of these features are provided by tools like Resharper, and I wonder if there isn't some kind of agreement (whether written or unspoken) where they don't step on each other's toes. To be honest, most documentation I have seen written in C# projects still makes me reach for the source code due to poor quality. Having lots of autocompleted tooling doesn't help when it comes to reading, only writing, in my experience.
(Whether I recommend it, not sure! I did it and then undid it, with suspicion that tests were taking longer due to, perhaps, worse caching of build artifacts.)
As for source for nuget packages, it's easy to enable source link to make that happen too, it's just that this is all pretty new so not every package is doing it.