←back to thread

Microsoft and OpenAI's close partnership shows signs of fraying

(www.nytimes.com)
321 points jhunter1016 | 1 comments | 18 Oct 24 11:11 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
solarkraft ◴[18 Oct 24 16:44 UTC] No.41881121[source]▶
How come I rarely see news about Anthropic? Aren’t they the closest competitor to ChatGPT with Claude? Or is LLama just so good that all the other inference providers without own products (Groq, Cerebras) are equally interesting right now?
replies(7): >>41881125 #>>41881158 #>>41881226 #>>41881285 #>>41881291 #>>41881447 #>>41883356 #
gman83 ◴[18 Oct 24 16:59 UTC] No.41881285[source]▶
Because there's less drama? I use Claude 3.5 Sonnet every day for helping me with coding. It seems to just work. It's been much better than GPT-4 for me, haven't tried o1, but don't really feel the need, very happy with Claude.
replies(1): >>41881298 #
ponty_rick ◴[18 Oct 24 17:00 UTC] No.41881298[source]▶
Sonnet 3.5 is phenomenal for coding, so much better than GPT or Llama 405 or anything else out there.
replies(1): >>41881393 #
douglasisshiny ◴[18 Oct 24 17:10 UTC] No.41881393[source]▶
I've heard this and haven't really experienced it with Go, typescript, elixir yet. I don't doubt the claim, but I wonder if I'm not prompting it correctly or something.
replies(3): >>41881965 #>>41882286 #>>41894588 #
1. ffsm8 ◴[18 Oct 24 18:10 UTC] No.41881965[source]▶
I've recently subscribed to sonnet after creating a new toy svelte project as I got slightly annoyed searching in the docs with how they're structured

It made the onboarding moderately easier for me.

Haven't successfully used any LLM at my day job though. Getting it to output the solution I already know I'll need is much slower then just doing it myself via auto complete