←back to thread

83 points marban | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.241s | source
Show context
RachelF ◴[] No.41873851[source]
The title of the article is incorrect, the worms live in the crust, not "beneath the planetary crust" (in the magma).

The Economist magazine is not what it used to be, sadly.

replies(4): >>41874314 #>>41874450 #>>41874757 #>>41875981 #
hinkley ◴[] No.41875981[source]
We’ve known about tube worms for an awfully long time. If we found them in the mantle that actually would be worth a news article. This is middle school biology. And has been for decades.
replies(2): >>41878041 #>>41887143 #
blackhawkC17 ◴[] No.41878041[source]
The Economist's specialty is business and finance, not science. It's not out of the place for their journalists to make such mistakes, the same way many science publications make silly mistakes when talking about business matters.
replies(1): >>41881644 #
1. hinkley ◴[] No.41881644[source]
Technically the article does say the young gestate farther into the vents, which is news. Not surprising news, but still news.

“Under the seabed” would have been more accurate.