Microsoft and OpenAI's close partnership shows signs of fraying

(www.nytimes.com)

321 points jhunter1016 | 1 comments | 18 Oct 24 11:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.254s | source

Show context

WithinReason ◴[18 Oct 24 12:04 UTC] No.41878604[source]▶

Does OpenAI have any fundamental advantage beyond brand recognition?

replies(15): >>41878633 #>>41878979 #>>41880635 #>>41880834 #>>41881554 #>>41881647 #>>41881720 #>>41881764 #>>41881926 #>>41882221 #>>41882479 #>>41882695 #>>41883076 #>>41883128 #>>41883207 #

piva00 ◴[18 Oct 24 12:53 UTC] No.41878979[source]▶

>>41878604 #

Not really sure since this space is so murky due to the rapid changes happening. It's quite hard to keep track of what's in each offering if you aren't deep into the AI news cycle.

Now personally, I've left the ChatGPT world (meaning I don't pay for a subscription anymore) and have been using Claude from Anthropic much more often for the same tasks, it's been better than my experience with ChatGPT. I prefer Claude's style, Artifacts, etc.

Also been toying with local LLMs for tasks that I know don't require a multi-hundred billion parameters to solve.

replies(3): >>41879021 #>>41879031 #>>41881421 #

1. Closi ◴[18 Oct 24 17:13 UTC] No.41881421[source]▶

>>41878979 #

ChatGPT-O1 is quite a bit better at certain complex tasks IMO (e.g. writing a larger bit of code against a non-trivial spec and getting it right).

Although there are also some tasks that Claude are better at too.

↑